Saturday, September 13, 2008

Some Musings on the Economy - Household Assets

While perusing the data published by the Fed, I came across a reference, and from it I constructed this table. It indicates that US national net worth has dropped by over $2 trillion in the two quarters ended last March. Here are the assets and liabilites:



I also made the following to show the changes in assets and liabilities. US households have assets of about $70 trillion and liabilites of about $14.5 trillion. As per the chart, the change in assets began to moderate about January 2003:


The actual data is from the following website, if you are interested. One problem with the data is it includes households and non-profits. I didn't make any attempt to seperate the two for these tables. So there is some inaccuracy.

I Can?

When I was a very young child, I had an experience which I remember to this day. While in kindergarten, my teacher once confronted all of us with the statement "you are Americans and you CAN".

Friday, September 5, 2008

Cost of Gasoline for my Subaru WRX

Another area of concern is the rising cost of gasoline, the cost of which has increased dramatically over the past few years.

I have kept detailed records for my Subaru. It is a 2005 Impreza WRX. Since February 2005 this is the cost per gallon for fuel for this vehicle:

Mileage varies per year. Here are the mileage stats:
2005 = 16,546
2006 = 15,532
2007 = 13,629
2008 = 12,413

You will note a mileage decrease each year. This is in part due to business decisions as I use my car for that purpose. However, changing my driving habits has also contributed. This was prompted by the increases in fuel prices as well as the desire to extend the life of the vehicle. The more I drive it, the faster I reach wear points and this increases the annual maintenance costs. I follow all manufacturer's recommendations at the designated mileage points.

Total fuel costs each year have been as follows:

2005 = $1,897.70
2006 = $1,783.12
2007 = $1,841.40
2008 = $1,790.42
A few general comments about the vehicle. This is the best handling vehicle I have ever owned. Here in the Midwest we get rain, sleet, ice and snow as well as dry pavement. Driving under all conditions has been exceptional. Combine the handling and the power and it is a lot of fun to drive. My spouse loves it!

I do not regret the decision to purchase this vehicle.

[This blog updated March 10, 2009]

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Cost of our Utilities over a period of 5 years

Returning to the immediate question, which is "how are we coping with the price increases". Here are the numbers for the actual out of pocket costs for utilities at our household:

2004 = $2,255.74, plus internet access = $2,821.19
2005 = $3,004.51
2006 = $3,270.98
2007 = $2,977.51
2008 = $2,060.22 for 8 months, probably $3,090.33 for the year.





Some notes about the above numbers. They include our household's definition of utilities, which include natural gas, electricity, water, sewer, telephone, basic cable TV and basic internet access via cable. 2004 did not include the cost of internet. So this should be adjusted to add the difference, which was $566.16 in 2005, to make a valid comparison with 2005. We do have central air conditioning and we use it. We did upgrade our hot water heater to a more efficient unit in 2006. We do annual preventative maintenance on our HVAC so it is in good condition and I change the filters quarterly. We also use a set-back thermometer. I've made no attempt to account for differences due to weather from year to year.

So what does this indicate? Here are the changes per year, expressed as a percentage, with 2004 as the base 100%. Years with utility costs higher than 2004 have a number greater than 100%. Years with utility costs less than 2004 have a number less than 100%:

2004 = 100.0%
2005 = 106.5%
2006 = 115.9%
2007 = 105.6%
2008 = 109.6%

Costs, while increasing, are not as great as I assumed. 2008 is on a trajectory to be about 10% higher than costs in 2004. That might seem like a lot, but consider inflation, which is historically expected to be in the range of 3.5 to 4.5% per year. Here is what my costs would be if my utility prices increased at the lower annual rate of inflation of 3.5%:

2004 = 100.0%
2005 = 103.5%
2006 = 107.12%
2007 = 110.87%
2008 = 114.75%

This compares fairly well to the actual costs over the past 5 years. Actual out of pocket "utilities" have cost my household $15,164.52 over the period 2004 through projected December 2008. Using the percentage increases based on a low inflation rate of 3.5% I would have spent $15,128.54 over that same period.

My conclusion? Surprise. Based upon what I have heard in the media, I expected my actual out of pocket costs to be higher than what they actually were. Over a period of 5 years, there had been continuous, but moderate increases. There are some spikes. 2006 was 15% higher then 2004 and about 9% higher than 2005. So it would seem that my budgeting needs to be tailored to accommodate large jumps from time to time. Other than that, I feel pretty good about the outcome. One caveat: to get a better handle on true "energy" costs, electricity and natural gas costs should be seperated from the other costs.

Looking toward the future, I expect that the next 5 years will have steeper increases than the previous 5 years. But who knows?

Basic Utilities Only

I did an analysis on just the energy components of the utilities; that is, natural gas and electric. The year 2004 was unusually low. Possibly due to milder weather. So I have included the year 2003 to determine if 2004 was an anomoly, and I believe it was. Here are natural gas and electric costs only:

2003 = $1,056.13
2004 = $ 884.92
2005 = $1,120.17
2006 = $1,186.58
2007 = $1,109.69
2008 = $ 714.53 for eight months, probably $1,071.80 for the year.



Options for Decreasing Utility Costs

If at some point I decide that the costs are "intolerable" I have a few options. Internet access in our area has become more competitive and I could switch from my current provider to another. This would decrease the cost for one or two years. Something worth considering. Another possibility is changing our phone service. We use AT&T with a robust package which yields unlimited calling within the US. We could downgrade to a local service and an internet telephony service, or a local service and an upgraded cell phone service. Either approach would lower our annual costs. So we have some options and we can use them to control our costs. As for the future, who knows? Of course, cable TV and internet access are ultimately "discretionary" expenses and we could limit or eliminate them altogether.

I have tracked all of the gasoline consumed in one of my cars. I'll post that in the next installment.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Coping with the Onslaught of Price Increases – Part II

I assume the limits of my spending will be reached when I have spent all of our free cash flow (all of our income) and I can no longer tap our credit cards, etc. However, we can voluntarily pull back before we reach that cliff. If we don’t and we continue to spend, then we face the possibility of another financial meltdown.

Of course, as we approach that cliff, any unanticipated price increase or unexpected expense, will nudge us closer to the financial precipice or over it. I guess that is why the financial experts recommend a personal cash emergency fund. Assuming I had such a fund, I could dip into it, should unexpected things come up.

That leads me to the definition of “unexpected’ which is similar to a discussion about “accidents”. In our culture, we use very broad brush strokes with the word “accident”. I’m driving 30 in a 20mph zone and I have to swerve to avoid a child, a dog in the road or another driver. If damage is the result, we call this event an “accident” although I was driving 50% faster than the posted speed limit. Similarly, if I am living my life on the financial edge, and additional expenses rear their ugly head, be it a chipped tooth, broken automobile or whatever, we call this an “unexpected” expense. This flies in the face of the notion that human beings frequently experience illness, and automobiles, being machines, have wear parts and do on occasion break down.

The definitions appear to be subjective. An "unexpected" expense was just so, because I never expected this would happen. Is is truly "unexpected" or was it simply poor planning on my part? I need to be honest with myself and my spouse. This also applies to “discretionary expenses”. What are they? I have seen a broad definition as an expense beyond necessities. Unfortunately, one man’s necessities are another woman’s requirements (just trying to be fair to the sexes here).

For example, one could argue the merits of cable TV. If having a television is considered a necessity, then I suppose that includes “basic” cable. However, many people would probably argue that HBO or Cinemax, ESPN1 or ESPN2, Sci-Fi and similar “premium channels” are a necessity.

I disagree. I view necessities as those things that are necessary for survival. Anything after that is discretionary, and is negotiable. Looking good, or even maintaining a standard of living is not a necessity. Over the years, I’ve had this conversation with many people. My view seems to be in the minority. Once, my youngest son needed a new pair of gym shoes. What followed was such a conversation. I agreed to get him a pair of good quality shoes. He vigorously insisted on a pair of Nike Air Jordan’s. Ultimately, I agreed to the purchase but with a stipulation. I’d provide the $70 which was the equivalent price of the pair I was willing to purchase and he would provide the cash difference. In the money he received for his allowance, performing his chores, etc. I always insisted that a percentage be saved. I suggested he take the difference from his “nest egg” to fund this absolutely necessary purchase. I gave him the money we agreed upon and interestingly, he never did purchase the Air Jordan’s. He purchased a different pair, and he may actually have been able to pocket some of the cash by purchasing something for even less. Had he manipulated me or had he decided that the Jordan’s were not a necessity? I don’t know his motivation but I know the result.

So it is with many "necessities". We find we can live without some things and some things we cannot. My spouse needed a new purse. A quality, made in the USA leather purse she decided was a necessity. A Louis Vuitton was not.

And so it goes. I decide I need a new car. Why? Because the one I have has 60,000 miles, or because I am tired of it? Because the dealer offered me a good deal on a new one? Recently, I took my Subaru in to the dealer for scheduled maintenance. He pointed out that I was approaching the time when I would need new brakes and quoted me $550 to do the job. I declined but authorized only the immediately necessary work. I decided to do some comparative shopping for the brakes. Upon completion of the absolutely necessary work, I returned and picked up the car. There was a conspicuous tag on the rear view mirror offering me a deal. “This could be the last maintenance you need to do on this car” the sign said. It offered a guarantee of $15,000 for a trade-in on a new one! Looked tempting, but I did a few quick mental calculations and realized that I would be taking on about $10,000 in debt. I have learned to do some comparisons to a mental “want” list that I have. It keeps me from making rash financial decisions. In this case, I quickly calculated what I else I could buy with that $10,000. I could retire debt, or purchase a flat screen TV and eight years of $1,000 vacations. I could purchase new living room furniture and (3) or so $1,000 vacations. The list went on and on,. Then I thought about why I didn’t have that flat screen TV. It was because I had said to myself that “I couldn’t afford it”. So how on earth could I afford a new car? The obvious answer is, I can't. Or I can, but I would be compromising my integrity.

To Be Continued......

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Coping with the Onslaught of Price Increases – Part I

There has been a lot of bad news recently about how Americans are surviving by raiding their retirement plans, maxing out their credit cards, etc. For example, I read one such article which dwelled on this. According to it, more Americans are raiding their 401(k) savings plans. It quoted a July study, released by the Center for American Progress, which found that workers in 2004 had $31 billion in outstanding 401(k) loans, a fivefold increase from $6 billion in 1989. From 1998 to 2004, an average of 12 percent of families with 401(k) plans borrowed from them.

At first glance, I noticed one item about this article that caught my attention. It used data from 2004. That was odd, I thought! This spurred me to check further into the source, which is a "think tank”. So I decided to check the data further. I discovered another, more reputable and current article. In an August 19 article in “Financial Week” data was cited and financial sources named, which indicated that more workers are shunning 401(k) loans. According to that article, both the number of outstanding 401(k) loans and the number of workers initiating such loans is decreasing.

This got me to thinking. I know people are dealing with increasing energy prices, increasing food prices and so on. I keep records of our recurring bills. I have the hard evidence that the cost of living which includes our groceries, natural gas, electricity and so on has increased over the past two years. I have also read in the media that in real terms, “many” people are not earning more than they did last year. I am talking about ordinary workers; such as people who are earning the median wage in this country. I'm excluding high wage earners, billionaires, hedge fund managers, etc.

So how are these ordinary people, one of whom I consider myself to be, coping with the onslaught of price increases? If they are coping, then at what point will it be impossible for them to continue to cope. And, at that time, what will occur? Will the wheels of consumerism in this country simply grind to a halt?

I can’t speak for how others are coping, but I can speak for myself. First, I am spending more this year than I did last year. I define some of that spending as discretionary. For example, my spouse and I have taken three trips. Two were with family and extended family members. One was a week long getaway which also included a family visit. These trips were all discretionary. I assume other families are coping by monitoring discretionary spending and by adjusting that. Perhaps the definition of what is discretionary and what is not, is currently changing in America. My definition may not be that of the typical American.

At this point, I will have to go off topic. If I were asked “what do I know about discretionary spending” that would be an appropriate question. What follows is my answer, from the perspective of my personal spending.

I keep detailed financial records, including earning and expenses by category. These are presently in Quicken software. Prior to that, I used manually generated spreadsheets. I started doing this about 20 years ago. The information I gleaned from this exercise and the financial discipline it enforced is how I survived my divorce. How difficult was it? I should have gone bankrupt. In fact, when the divorce negotiations were complete, I told my lawyer there was no way I could survive. I had done the numbers. However, that was a Nietzschian moment and somehow I did survive, although 14 years later I was still cleaning it up. How can I in a few words describe my divorce? How about “Mortgaging Your Future in One Easy Lesson”? In truth, it was not the divorce that did it. It was the divorce and the 15 years that preceded it. From personal experience, I am clear that it is possible to dig a really deep financial hole over the span of only a few years.

Somehow I did not go bankrupt and I even honored all of my debts. I negotiated payment plans with all of my creditors, moved the debt around, and so on. It took over a decade to clean up. During that period I personally redefined the term “discretionary spending”. During the first few years I had a total of $75 per month budgeted for my food, clothing, household, toiletries, phone, internet and entertainment. Forget about vacations and dining out. Simultaneously I took on more debt to pay for the kids’ college. This gave me additional incentives to keep working. It also extended the time it would take to achieve "freedom from debt", assuming I stopped taking on any additional debt.

This terrible process was in some respects a godsend. I learned a lot about what discretionary spending really was. For a long time, going to Dunkin’ Donuts was a discretionary expense; don’t even think about Starbucks! My spread sheet was arranged with one month per column and with rows listing creditors first, then alimony, rent, electricity, water, health insurance, auto insurance, vehicle license, gasoline and a monthly savings amount to provide for projected auto maintenance (oil changes, pro-rata monthly cost of brakes, maintenance at 20,000 mile intervals, tires, licensing), medical, dental, taxes, college tuition, fees, dormitory expense, dependents’ travel expense for college, dependents’ health insurance, and finally entertainment. Then there were some rows for any additional items. The amount in each cell was updated weekly. Rows were added as different expense categories became apparent. Projected numbers in columns going out 5 years were updated as real data was acquired, insurance premiums changed, etc. This was banged against my net income each month, and savings (if any). At the bottom of the spread sheet was a single cell containing a number which represented my financial status. If it was a positive number my spending would be less than my income for the next 12 months. If negative, my spending would exceed my income.

Each day, I literally tracked every nickel in my pocket. It could have been worse. I could have been tracking grains of rice, as they do in many poor households in this world. The bad news was, the financial status number was always negative. So work more and spend less. Of course, I had built in so much debt, it didn’t matter if I stopped spending or not. I could and did stretch out as much debt as possible. At the time, I was extremely fortunate. Credit was readily available and cheap. So even though my net worth was a negative number and would continue to be, I could creatively stretch out debt.

As I retired debt, I had the option of moving the released funds to purchase “discretionary” items, or to save it. How did I survive? Well, it was a long, long road. But eventually, that cell in the spreadsheet containing my financial status number became consistently positive.

I did remarry and my spouse is a really good partner. She and I have discussed that question. Was it luck? Was it the “will of God”? I don’t know. I do know that if I had not been healthy I would not have survived financially. I took many risks, but good health permitted me to continue working, at times incredible hours (for example, 30 consecutive days averaging 12 hours per day). Good health permitted me to avoid our costly health care system; I had and still have a major medical policy which pays for very little. I consider it to be “catastrophic insurance”. So avoiding doctors keeps my bills to a minimum. For years I could not afford a dentist, medical checkup or even new prescription glasses. As I dug my way out of the pit I had constructed I paid off creditors. That released money for the eye exam, then the dentist, and finally 10 years later, a medical exam. During this entire period I kept my “nose to the grindstone”. At times I was ready to give up and nearly stopped, but I never did. My spouse tells me that when she first met me, she noticed that I was gaunt, a gray man wearing gray clothes with glasses held together with electrical tape. I was fading.

Even though I could say I had no choice in the matter that would be untrue. We did spend the money. In cleaning it up, I also decided to honor my debts. I decided to support my children in pursuing their college dreams.

In the end, a discussion about discretionary spending is really a discussion about choice. We choose many aspects of our lives. We choose where we live. We choose the electronics and entertainment we spend our money on. We choose the vehicles we drive and we choose the frequency we drive them and we choose how far to drive them. This is one example. If I choose to live 75 miles from my place of work, with that choice there are attendant lifestyle and budget choices. Driving 150 miles per day requires allocating substantial financial resources to the fuel, maintenance and replacement costs of an automobile. That is a choice predicated on some assumptions. The cost of gasoline will never go up or if it does, I’ll still be able to afford it. Driving my car 39,000 miles each year to and from work is an expense I can afford, and I can afford to replace that vehicle every three years, etc. etc.

When I was in New Orleans prior to Katrina, I was told by people I met that they loved that city and would never leave it. After Katrina many people did make the difficult choice not to return. That is the way it is with choice. We can choose how we are as we live our life, or we can have circumstances choose for us. Either way, it can be difficult.

Currently, what we may be experiencing is the reaching of the limits of spending for the American family. But if that is so, what might happen next? If I reach my limits and go beyond the threshold of pain, then what? And how will I deal with it?

Continued in Part II.

Monday, September 1, 2008

Hurricane!

Well, the media is having another feeding frenzy. This time it is hurricane Gustav. I hope and pray the people of the Gulf Coast are spared.

I heard Clarence Ray Nagin, Jr., the Mayor of New Orleans, extolling everyone to leave the city and describing the hurricane as “the storm of the century”. Good for him. As we used to say, "they can learn"! However, his incompetence a few years ago contributed greatly to that disaster. But they re-elected him, anyway!

I know a little of what I speak. I experienced the full force of a category 4 storm some years before Katrina. It was called “Hugo” and it slammed into the South Carolina coast, washing away parts of Charleston. At the time, the situation was similar to that I found myself in as Katrina approached New Orleans. I had been in the Charleston area conducting business. My client had told me not to worry about the hurricane and come on down, those things always veered away! So against my better judgment I caught a flight, and upon landing and as I was driving my rental car out of the Charleston Airport, I turned on the radio, tuning to the local news. The reporter was describing how the US Navy had just left Charleston harbor and was pulling out to the safety of the deep ocean. At that point the lights in my brain went on and I realized “I’m going the wrong way”!

Well, I’ll tell you, I certainly was, and the next few weeks were not good. Not good at all! The hurricane was a frightening thing and damage was extensive. My motel was spared the worst of it, but the electric, air conditioning and water were out. For several days after landfall I drank and used water with which I had previously filled the bathtub. (I had first scrubbed it and bleached it and then after filling with tap water had covered it with visqueen plastic, taped in place). The week after Hugo was anything but fun. However, I learned a good lesson from that “adventure”. First, the locals, who are frequently under threat of hurricanes and experience many near misses, cope with the situation with a denial mechanism. For this reason, they cannot be trusted to use good judgment when it comes to predicting hurricanes. Second, the politicians should not be trusted. For an idea of how politicians are, in my view, observe the mayor in the movie “Jaws”.

Prior to Hugo making landfall, I concluded that the governor of South Carolina was a dolt, as he was making pre-Katrina style speeches about preparation, etc. However, the mayor of Charleston was an incredible man. He was a little old guy and it was only after experiencing Hugo that I really understood him. He had been there and done that, and had not forgotten how it could be! I watched him being interviewed on a local TV station and he was telling the talking head that “everyone must leave Charleston NOW”! The reporter said something to the effect, with a sneer in his voice “Mayor, are you telling us that this is dangerous?” To which this mayor turned and looking into the camera, pointed at the viewers and forcefully said “I’m telling you that if you are here tomorrow, you will be dead, DEAD!” At this, the reporter stammered something more or less incoherent. I thought, man, now that’s telling it like it is! Under the mayor’s pressure, all lanes of I-26 were opened westbound and the exodus began. The people did leave!

Fast forward to Katrina, and in my view, the leadership from the Mayor of New Orleans was terrible. So the people stayed and we know how that turned out. But I wasn't one of them. Yes, I again was in the path of a hurricane, but I was older and wiser. So when I saw the force and breadth of Katrina as it was crossing Florida, I checked the temperature of the waters in the gulf. I knew it was going to be very, very bad. Trust your own experience and judgement, and let the politicians and talking heads be damned, I said!

I called my spouse and we discussed things, as usual. This time, that included the weather and I told her I did not like that hurricane “Katrina”, which was hammering Florida. She responded "that’s a long way from New Orleans, honey!” to which I gave her my concerns and told her I was watching its progress very closely.

As Katrina bore down on New Orleans, I shifted my plans to leave into high gear. I don’t think my client really understand my fuss. Two days before Katrina made landfall I completed my work and left for the airport. As the Avis bus took me to the terminal, I struck up a conversation with the driver, and asked him where he was going for cover. He said he was staying and would be fine! I reminded him of the anticipated magnitude of this hurricane and that it exceeded the strength of the levies surrounding New Orleans. He again repeated the mantra “things will be fine”! I told him he was taking a terrible risk, that I had experienced the full wrath of a category 4 hurricane and said “God be with you” as I departed the bus. Walking into the terminal, I had expected crowds and flights to be full, but no, the airport was pretty lazy and the flights were less than half full! Obviously, people just didn’t get it. An hour and a half later, the airplane with me in it, rose into the gray sky and I said a silent prayer for the people of New Orleans, and cursed the politicians.

We know the rest of that story, and it was indeed ugly. Some months later, I returned to my client in New Orleans to assist in getting that facility back into production. I saw firsthand the destruction in Chalmette, the Irish Bayou, and other coastal communities. Over the period of a month I had the opportunity to have a lot of conversations with these Katrina survivors. Many people did very brave things, had fed and cared for their neighbors for days and weeks after Katrina. But in the national media, you seldom heard about that. Instead, the focus was how terrible things were in the 9th ward of New Orleans. That’s politics for you! I asked Chuck, one of the employees of my client, what he would do if another Katrina were to come, and his response was “I’m moving to Idaho”!

+++++++++

If you are thinking I am being hard on the Mayor of New Orleans, let me say this. People in New Orleans and many communities rely heavily on their local leaders for clear, concise and truthful information, direction and guidance. No matter what the governor, senators or congressmen say on the boob tube, what the mayor says will carry inordinate weight for local matters. That is what I saw in Charleston and that is what I saw in New Orleans.

After the fact, it becomes politically expedient to pass the blame to the top, which is where the deep pockets are. But the failures begin at a local level. I saw statistics after Hugo and as I recall, in Charleston proper, there was more loss of life from accidents which occurred while felling trees after that hurricane, than there were during the hurricane. That, I think, tells it all! My hat is off to that Mayor of Charleston for having the political courage and the common sense to put the people of that city first, and get them out of harm's way. He didn't tell people what they wanted to hear. He told them what they needed to hear. That is why we elect our leaders, that is what he was paid to do and he did it.

Links:

http://www.csc.noaa.gov/crs/cohab/hurricane/hugo/hugo.htm

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1989hugo.html